“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after far they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last observed.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Deterrence: The fear of severe consequences, such as capital punishment, is meant to deter opportunity criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is very important in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala along with the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade of your accused hasn't been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused tried to get advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image from the petitioner was commonly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity in the accused through electronic media. The legislation lends assurance to the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for the witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and made photographs. Aside from, the images shown to the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity right until he was set up for an identification parade. Making pictures in the accused publically, both by showing the same to the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or plan, would create doubt from the proceedings with the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make sure that there isn't any chance with the witness to begin to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the push or electronic media. Presented the reasons elaborated higher than, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques employed by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological elements allows to get a more in depth legal response.
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is usually a mandatory necessity plus a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation demands that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
Section 302 with the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death website of another individual, they shall be matter into the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
acquitted the appellants from the many charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses which include self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which could cause reduced charges or acquittal.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay out fixation are not entertainable to the reasons that these types of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, as well as the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as such this petition is dismissed, which includes disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is not within a position to dilate upon these kinds of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
To acquire notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia plus the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become out there, please enter your contact information under.